Log In | Contact | | | Email | Print



Berkeley presenters Lizzy Ghedi-Ehrlich, Kyra Davis, Valerie Norton, and Albert Fang at a seminar entitled "Developing the Progressive Policy Landscape"

News from the National Office

On Campus

> More

"Far better is it to dare mighty things, to win glorius triumphs, even though checkered by failure... than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much, because they live in a gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."

— Teddy Roosevelt 


 

25 Ideas for 25 Years in the Future


The Challenge: Ensure a thriving America when today’s college students are our nation’s leaders

Important

Progressive: accomplishing this challenge will contribute directly and specifically to the progressive values embodied by Roosevelt's Statement of Principles

Meaningful: our contribution to this challenge will produce a real change in the lives of our fellow human beings. One can imagine a world in which the challenge is solved, and such a world is better than the one we live in today.

Relevant: the challenge is relevant to the social contract project that Roosevelt has embarked upon

As entitlement costs continue to increase faster than the other sectors of the federal budget, many of our progressive ideals may be impossible to realize when we reach our 40s and 50s. According to the Government Accountability Office, by 2026, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid will consume all federal tax receipts if revenues remain constant (http://www.concordcoalition.org/events/fiscal-wake-up/fiscal-wake-up-call.htm). The picture continues to deteriorate as more baby boomers retire. Money would then lack for other domestic and international programs progressives hold dear – or the government would have to face a tremendous amount of debt that the same study projects would reach 10% of GDP in 2027 and over 20% in 2039. (The worst debts of this administration were only about 4% of GDP in 2003.)

Intelligent changes now can reduce this potential handicap for the nation and the progressive movement. Yet as Robert Bixby from the Concord Coalition, an organization committed to a responsible budget, notes, “The real choices require scaling back future health care and retirement benefit promises, raising revenues to pay for them, or -- most likely – some combination of both.” Progressives must contend with this paradox of reducing the extent of the social contract in order to allow the nation and other aspects of our agenda to thrive.

We as college students possibly would not normally focus our attention on programs such as Medicare that we will not benefit from for at least another 40 years. However, we are the generation that will suffer if health care costs from Medicare especially are not reigned in. And the lack of personal savings in the United States – it has been negative for over one year – further threatens our country, especially with these prospects of large deficits.

Innovative

We're looking for policy challenges where innovation is needed: where there isn't already a clear solution or best practices, but solutions can be developed creatively. Our goal is to develop options, not to lobby or advocate for a solution that is already known or to debate among several yes or no outcomes or pre-defined policy choices. Other organizations do the important work of debating and lobbying, that's just not our place in the process.

Typically if you're looking at a standard policy debate you can apply what's known as the "Roosevelt Reframe" to develop new strategies to advance shared values. So rather than "should we engage in race-based affirmative action in college admissions" to which the potential answers are "yes" and "no", you can ask "how do we make our colleges more diverse", a goal we hope is shared by those on both sides of that debate.

Innovation is certainly possible on this issue. Tax increases can come from taxing damaging aspects of consumption such as cigarettes or carbon emissions. Extremely progressive rates and very high incomes can discourage CEOs from taxing huge windfalls when their workers receive much less. A wide variety of mechanisms can improve savings.

Feasible

Approachable: given the level of research and discourse already available and given who else is working on the issue, college students with a range of experience levels and with varied types of expertise can contribute meaningfully to the debate and are likely to think of good ideas. We don't want something so technical only engineering majors can contribute to it, or something that is already dominated by another think tank or advocacy organization.

Practical: the challenge is stated as a specific, measurable, and achievable goal, incremental progress toward which could be made by chipping away at the problem at various levels of government. The statement is not too broad or too narrow. One good way to make sure something is a good policy challenge rather than a debate or advocacy problem is to think of what sorts of innovative ideas might be produced for the 25 ideas publication series on that topic.

Remember, the Summer Research College can will research these proposals and give students a strong background and grasp of health and tax policy central to this challenge. Last year, pursuing this challenge would not have been possible, but with this new Summer Research initiative, students will be prepared to propose policies on these topics.